Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I haven't played Hollow Knight, but Shovel Knight is awesome.

 

I don't know how long Hollow Knight is, but depending how good you are Shovel Knight isn't very long, you can pretty easily do it in one longish sitting. If you want to get one out of the way, start with Shovel Knight. Otherwise play Hollow Knight and let me know if I should buy it.

From what I have been seeing on the internet people are nuts about Hollow Knight.  And it won best MV on a bunch of website I looked at.  Every YouTube review I watched said it was amazing. I also ened up buying Dead Cells to because people are saying it's really good as well. 

  • Upvote (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post

Jetpack is by far the worst problem afflicting Reach.

 

Bloom is bad, sure, but at least it can be managed by pacing one's shot. Armor lock is also dumb, but it's so seldom used that I really couldn't care less.

 

Jetpack however is the second most used armor ability, just behind the still problematic, but far less enraging sprint.

 

It breaks every single map. Intended play styles are rendered null-and-void. Players can obtain unearned positioning advantages easily thru its use. And players routinely use it to get out of a map's bounds (Coagulation is the primary example of this).

 

The worst thing about it though is that players who get what essentially amounts to unearned kills with it think they're much better than they really are.

 

That such a terrible mechanic even made it thru play testing is astounding. And I'll even go a step further; if jet pack was not in Reach, I'd have no reservations about calling it a great Halo game.

  • Upvote (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post

Jetpack is by far the worst problem afflicting Reach.

 

Bloom is bad, sure, but at least it can be managed by pacing one's shot. Armor lock is also dumb, but it's so seldom used that I really couldn't care less.

 

Jetpack however is the second most used armor ability, just behind the still problematic, but far less enraging sprint.

 

It breaks every single map. Intended play styles are rendered null-and-void. Players can obtain unearned positioning advantages easily thru its use. And players routinely use it to get out of a map's bounds (Coagulation is the primary example of this).

 

The worst thing about it though is that players who get what essentially amounts to unearned kills with it think they're much better than they really are.

 

That such a terrible mechanic even made it thru play testing is astounding. And I'll even go a step further; if jet pack was not in Reach, I'd have no reservations about calling it a great Halo game.

I was with you right up until the last sentence. The whole MP was unplayable until 343 saved it.

Share this post


Link to post

I was with you right up until the last sentence. The whole MP was unplayable until 343 saved it.

Meh, it has problems (armor abilities), but I'm good at it, so I like it.

 

If things like bloom were tweaked, it could've accentuated the skill gap.

 

Here's what I mean by tweaking:

 

1) After firing only about 4 or 5 shots, the DMR will reach full bloom. This full bloom status is not nearly large enough to discourage spamming. So basically everyone spams close to 100% of the time (I actually don't, but whatever). I would remove this cap to the bloom. So spammers would have to deal with an increasingly inaccurate gun.

 

2) To be honest, it would be preferable if the size of the bloom were increased to further discourage spamming.

 

3) And finally, to further encourage pacing, I'd reduce the time the reticle would take to reset by about 10-20%.

 

If these changes were made to bloom, then it would theoretically increase the skill cap as there would be a new focus on timely acurracy.

Share this post


Link to post

Bloom is a dumb in Halo mechanic please stop

As it was, yes. That doesn't mean that it can't be done better.

 

And besides, I'm not saying that 343 should use it again for a primary weapon, just that it could be used for the DMR again if we wanted the sandbox to feel less redundant.

Share this post


Link to post

As it was, yes. That doesn't mean that it can't be done better.

 

And besides, I'm not saying that 343 should use it again for a primary weapon, just that it could be used for the DMR again if we wanted the sandbox to feel less redundant.

Putting in bloom in any capacity is dumb. If we want the sandbox to feel less redundant they need to make a sandbox that isn't redundant

  • Upvote (+1) 5

Share this post


Link to post

Putting in bloom in any capacity is dumb. If we want the sandbox to feel less redundant they need to make a sandbox that isn't redundant

If you rewatch old vods of MLG games circa 2010-2011, you'll notice that absolutely no player even attempts to pace their shots.

 

Why is this? Because players realized that spamming as many shots as fast as possible was simply more likely to result in a kill. If I were able to modify the mechanic, I'd make it so that this would not be their conclusion (see above).

 

I am NOT saying that this mechanic should return for Halo 6 on all the primary weapons. Just that experiments with it on the DMR could actually result in interesting gameplay this series hasn't had before.

  • Upvote (+1) 2

Share this post


Link to post

Bloom results in longer kill times which we don't need in Halo. If someone is zooming across an area with sprint, the last thing I'd want to do is pace my shots. Just weakens the individual.

Share this post


Link to post

Bloom results in longer kill times which we don't need in Halo. If someone is zooming across an area with sprint, the last thing I'd want to do is pace my shots. Just weakens the individual.

Not necessarily.

 

Lets suppose for a moment that you control the development of the Halo weapon sandbox.

 

In this particular instance, you'd be designing a weapon that serves the same mid/long range function that the DMR serves in Halo: Reach.

 

You don't want the gun to be too powerful, otherwise it would throw off the game's weapon balance.

 

You end up approaching a choice. One gun has a slightly faster theoretical ttk, but has a redesigned bloom mechanic with a larger emphasis on pacing, and the other gun has a slightly longer ttk, but with no bloom mechanic present.

 

Does choosing one or the other really empower the individual? My point here is that bloom can have a legitimate place as a balancing mechanic IF done correctly, and that it wouldn't necessarily disempower the individual relative to other options.

Share this post


Link to post

Bloom doesn't make the game more interesting nor does it add skill.

 

It's not "spamming" to be able to hit all your shots with a moderate firing rate weapon like the DMR at the maximum firing rate.

 

You can add projectiles.  You can add recoil.  You can add bullet damage fall-off and have the reticle change color to signify that it's affecting your bullets.  You can lower scope magnification or remove the scope entirely.  I'd prefer pretty much any range limiting solution over bloom on precision rifles, bar random spread.

 

But the most obvious solution is to not have four or five fucking rifles in the first place when there aren't even that many distinct engagement ranges in the game.

  • Upvote (+1) 2

Share this post


Link to post

Bloom doesn't make the game more interesting nor does it add skill.

 

It's not "spamming" to be able to hit all your shots with a moderate firing rate weapon like the DMR at the maximum firing rate.

 

It's more difficult to hit all of your shots when you have consciously take into account the timing of said shots.

 

It's not the ROF that makes firing the DMR ASAP spamming, it's that the player is ignoring the visual feedback of the bloom in an attempt to get an RNG kill that makes it spamming. FTR, any bloom mechanic that I'd implement would make that decision unviable at all but the closest ranges.

 

Shooting the H5 Magnum ASAP is obviously not spamming because that gun doesn't actually have bloom. 343 reduced its effectiveness via other means, like reducing the RRR and making its zoom-in only slight.

 

What I'm proposing is that a newly redesigned bloom mechanic, with an increased focus on pacing, be implemented at some time in the future on one of the rifles.

  • Downvote (-1) 1

Share this post


Link to post

What I'm proposing is that a newly redesigned bloom mechanic, with an increased focus on pacing, be implemented at some time in the future on one of the rifles.

Yeah, no thanks.
  • Upvote (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post

Lets suppose for a moment that you control the development of the Halo weapon sandbox.

No bloom on precision weapons, because that's dumb.

 

A Magnum that's actually satisfying to use.

 

Stop making autos so fucking powerful in a vain attempt to appeal to casuals.

 

Plasma stun.

 

 

 

That's really all it would take to get it going in the right direction.

Share this post


Link to post

Bloom just makes things RNG. There is no perfect bloom mechanic unless you mean your shots just disappear if you fire too fast and are perfectly accurate otherwise. 

 

And even then though it's really skillful, it's also annoying AF. Imagine not killing someone because you pulled the trigger again after .29999 seconds instead of .3 seconds. Oh and then people would probably just mod their controller so it can only take inputs after .3 seconds.

  • Upvote (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post

@@Infinity do you play / still play melee

 

i need people to netplay with since im getting more into smash than halo these days

 

 

I play casually but I still go to my local tournaments at school. What region are you in? I'm definitely a netplay fan.

Share this post


Link to post

I play casually but I still go to my local tournaments at school. What region are you in? I'm definitely a netplay fan.

michigan so midwest. arent you NJ? no idea what pings would be like but they shouldnt be terrible. i just recently tried getting back into smash after taking like an 8+ year break from it and have been enjoying my time back to it and actually trying to improve at it

Share this post


Link to post

Assault Android Cactus is on Deals With Gold right now, and it is worth your money. This game is so fucking good.

Share this post


Link to post

Alright, TB, I could use assistance in finding a good 4k TV with HDR support, low latency and no bigger then 40". I've recently upgraded to a One X, but I'm having trouble picking out a suitable TV to complement it. Please don't suggest any computer monitors, my current setup simply won't allow it.

 

EDIT: https://www.bestbuy.com/site/samsung-40-class-39-9-diag--led-2160p-smart-4k-ultra-hd-tv/6028900.p?skuId=6028900&ref=212&loc=1&ksid=fa52e40f-3b2e-40dc-9240-8d2dae301ba3&ksprof_id=16&ksaffcode=pg265314&ksdevice=m&lsft=ref:212,loc:2&gclid=EAIaIQobChMImMyvk-ic2QIVxlqGCh2nLAwQEAQYASABEgLeg_D_BwE

 

This looks good to me, but I'm not finding anything about latency.

Share this post


Link to post

Alright, TB, I could use assistance in finding a good 4k TV with HDR support, low latency and no bigger then 40". I've recently upgraded to a One X, but I'm having trouble picking out a suitable TV to complement it. Please don't suggest any computer monitors, my current setup simply won't allow it.

 

EDIT: https://www.bestbuy.com/site/samsung-40-class-39-9-diag--led-2160p-smart-4k-ultra-hd-tv/6028900.p?skuId=6028900&ref=212&loc=1&ksid=fa52e40f-3b2e-40dc-9240-8d2dae301ba3&ksprof_id=16&ksaffcode=pg265314&ksdevice=m&lsft=ref:212,loc:2&gclid=EAIaIQobChMImMyvk-ic2QIVxlqGCh2nLAwQEAQYASABEgLeg_D_BwE

 

This looks good to me, but I'm not finding anything about latency.

you can search through https://displaylag.com/display-database/ You might be able to find something you like for the same price/cheaper as yours is not listed.

 

otherwise AFAIK there's no other place to find input lag. the MU series on that list are ranging from 20-30 (aka your model) but it's not guaranteed yours will be that

Share this post


Link to post

Alright, TB, I could use assistance in finding a good 4k TV with HDR support, low latency and no bigger then 40". I've recently upgraded to a One X, but I'm having trouble picking out a suitable TV to complement it. Please don't suggest any computer monitors, my current setup simply won't allow it.

 

EDIT: https://www.bestbuy.com/site/samsung-40-class-39-9-diag--led-2160p-smart-4k-ultra-hd-tv/6028900.p?skuId=6028900&ref=212&loc=1&ksid=fa52e40f-3b2e-40dc-9240-8d2dae301ba3&ksprof_id=16&ksaffcode=pg265314&ksdevice=m&lsft=ref:212,loc:2&gclid=EAIaIQobChMImMyvk-ic2QIVxlqGCh2nLAwQEAQYASABEgLeg_D_BwE

 

This looks good to me, but I'm not finding anything about latency.

https://www.cnet.com/news/nvidia-bfgd-monitor-65-inch-4k-hdr-gaming-glory-ces-2018/

Share this post


Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.