Cold As Life Posted June 9, 2013 I was rolling during the bar scene with the girl and taking on the 5 guys. Haha, right! "Just remember, you wanted this." Haha Quote Share this post Link to post
VeryUncouth Posted June 9, 2013 I'm hoping to go see Man of Steel either at the midnight showing or after, might possibly be the Superhero movie of the year and the best Superman movie ever. Quote Share this post Link to post
Reason Posted June 9, 2013 ^ Already got my midnight IMAX tickets. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post
Enemy Posted June 9, 2013 the purge let me down..anyone else ready for the next expendables? my favorite movie right now would be: fast 6, and pain & gain. Quote Share this post Link to post
heytred Posted June 9, 2013 ^ Already got my midnight IMAX tickets. My buddy is the manager of the local movie theater. Wednesday night we're bringing some beer and holding a private viewing. I am excite. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post
Scalzo Posted June 9, 2013 My buddy is the manager of the local movie theater. Wednesday night we're bringing some beer and holding a private viewing. I am excite. when you say "beer" what exactly are you referring to? Quote Share this post Link to post
heytred Posted June 9, 2013 when you say "beer" what exactly are you referring to? Why, Natty Ice of course. Quote Share this post Link to post
heytred Posted June 9, 2013 Probably some local Sweetwater Schweet or something. A friend Tim is a promoter for a large music venue in Atlanta and gets ungodly amounts of Sweetwater for super cheap. Considering we are a bunch of poor ass broke dicks, it's our best bet. Quote Share this post Link to post
Reason Posted June 9, 2013 My buddy is the manager of the local movie theater. Wednesday night we're bringing some beer and holding a private viewing. I am excite. Goodshit! Quote Share this post Link to post
L0L33TA Posted June 9, 2013 Saw "Now You See Me" the other day. It was alright. I had higher expectations for it, but it was entertaining nonetheless. Needed more Morgan Freeman. :wub: Quote Share this post Link to post
inxy Posted June 10, 2013 Watching some of Aaron Paull's movies before he started breaking bad. Quote Share this post Link to post
Reason Posted June 10, 2013 The only thing of note pre-Breaking Bad is a very minor role in Mission: Impossible 3. LOL Quote Share this post Link to post
Vertigo Posted June 10, 2013 If you want a good post-start to Breaking Bad check out Smashed. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post
overuled Posted June 10, 2013 Watched TT3D: Closer to the Edge. If you're a fan of the TT, Bikes and Motorsport or even just Documentaries in general it's a must watch. Great personalities and amazingly shot. Watching some of Aaron Paull's movies before he started breaking bad. Van Wilder. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post
Cold As Life Posted June 11, 2013 hype hype hype Can hardly wait for this! Such a huge Tolkien fan. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post
shzlss Posted June 12, 2013 hype hype hype The genius of Cyren's content finding ability knows no bounds. But yes, so excited! except... Smaug looks iffy. Idk, he just looks... off. To me at least Quote Share this post Link to post
Scalzo Posted June 12, 2013 Well considering that the first hobbit was terrible, its a safe bet to asume the same with part two 1 1 Quote Share this post Link to post
Cold As Life Posted June 12, 2013 Well considering that the first hobbit was terrible, its a safe bet to asume the same with part two Terrible? You have a right to your opinion, but I do not agree. Terrible is a pretty strong description, and it is far from what The Hobbit was, IMO. Quote Share this post Link to post
Reason Posted June 12, 2013 Peter Jackson is going George Lucas with all the CGI. Three films is unnecessary even though I don't mind going back to middle-earth, and you're wasting Cumberbatch by making him play Smaug! Quote Share this post Link to post
Cold As Life Posted June 12, 2013 Peter Jackson is going George Lucas with all the CGI. Three films is unnecessary even though I don't mind going back to middle-earth, and you're wasting Cumberbatch by making him play Smaug! Agreed. But he is also playing the Necromancer, which will have a bigger role in the second film. And i also believe I read an article about a year ago in which Cumberbatch says that he wanted to have a more of behind the scenes kinda role in The Hobbit films. I'll try to find the article. Quote Share this post Link to post
Scalzo Posted June 12, 2013 Agreed. But he is also playing the Necromancer, which will have a bigger role in the second film. And i also believe I read an article about a year ago in which Cumberbatch says that he wanted to have a more of behind the scenes kinda role in The Hobbit films. I'll try to find the article. I agree with what reason said. I a a fan of the LOTR films, and the book The Hobbit. and yes terrible is a strong word but Im not the only one to associate it with the film. The main problem with it is that Jackson and co took a lovely short story arc and stretched it out into a limp wet noodle of a story. IDK whose idea it was to do this but they shouldn't work in the business anymore. Visually made me want to puke rainbows "It frequently seems as though Jackson was less interested in making The Hobbit than in remaking his own fabulously successful Lord of the Rings series." and Peter Jackson is that obvious, lol what a money grubbing fucknut. A smart one, but nonetheless the movie shouldnt have been split into three parts, its a clearly an easy way to tripple the money you make Quote Share this post Link to post
Cold As Life Posted June 12, 2013 I agree with what reason said. I a a fan of the LOTR films, and the book The Hobbit. and yes terrible is a strong word but Im not the only one to associate it with the film. The main problem with it is that Jackson and co took a lovely short story arc and stretched it out into a limp wet noodle of a story. IDK whose idea it was to do this but they shouldn't work in the business anymore. Visually made me want to puke rainbows "It frequently seems as though Jackson was less interested in making The Hobbit than in remaking his own fabulously successful Lord of the Rings series." and Peter Jackson is that obvious, lol what a money grubbing fucknut. A smart one, but nonetheless the movie shouldnt have been split into three parts, its a clearly an easy way to tripple the money you make I liked the movie, and thought that it looked awesome in just the regular 3D. But I will agree with you on one thing, it would have been better to keep it as one film. But the benefit of three films, IMO, is that we get more of Tolkien's universe thrown into the film. In the end, to each their own. Quote Share this post Link to post
Scalzo Posted June 12, 2013 Film criteria is more important to me than fanboy/nerd criteria Generally speaking, adaptations are almost never good or true to the source, Film and Books are two completely different mediums. So for me the source material is always better and I never feel the need to see the "tokien universe" because i have it in my head and i dont need to see some Directors POV. You seem like the kind of person who would complain about Khan in the new Star Trek Quote Share this post Link to post