Jump to content
CyReN

HCS Pro League Summer 2016 Teams, Seeds, and Discussion‏

Recommended Posts

I think the best way to provide feedback or fix these rotations is to read the explanations that 343 provides for their changes and counter it to facts and actual arguments. Complaining blindly and just saying things like" this map is cancer" or "omg bring Bungie back, fuck 343" while it could be justified, it just isn't the proper way to go about things.

 

Yes, I also think that these settings should be a different playlist and yes Riptide and Overgrowth  aren't my favorites maps, but I just wanted to share my opinion on here.

You're right obviously but its hard to keep caring that much sometimes.

Share this post


Link to post

Yea the huge online H1 community was probably super happy about it back then

 

Remember that time Halo 3 launched with Snowbound and Epitaph?

  • Upvote (+1) 2

Share this post


Link to post

If you want to know why 343 doesn't listen to the community it's because everyone starts overreacting and making a big deal before even testing the settings.

  • Upvote (+1) 5
  • Downvote (-1) 3

Share this post


Link to post

It's not that we want radar in. I am all for testing no radar, but I currently have to explain why we don't think riptide will work in competitive. Also we have been over this before. Pros do not determine what we test or do not test. they tell us what we play and we have to do it for our opinion to be taken seriously. I wish it wasn't like this somewhat but it is just what we are working with currently. 

 

Other than the tendency to stalemate (and presumably the dead zone area where they just moved the H2BR), what are your issues with Riptide?

Share this post


Link to post

counter it to facts and actual arguments.

 

200_s.gif

 

would do if it could make any difference, but its 343 after all.

Share this post


Link to post

Dude, I don't need to play Riptide or Overgrowth to tell you they're fucking terrible. There is no change you can make to those maps to make them good. I play enough Halo to know the changes are bad. Like the other guy, last time they changed Arena I quit playing.

 

Also, I'm not a tester. I want to play the competitive playlist.

You're the problem

  • Upvote (+1) 2
  • Downvote (-1) 9

Share this post


Link to post

Other than the tendency to stalemate (and presumably the dead zone area where they just moved the H2BR), what are your issues with Riptide?

I haven't played the new one so I don't have any comments on it yet. Was just using it as an example to the situation we are put in. 

Share this post


Link to post

How about this, dont give your opinion on anything until you've played at least 3 matches on each gametype and can provide proof .

 

 

 

:simms:

 

(not directed at anyone)

  • Upvote (+1) 2
  • Downvote (-1) 2

Share this post


Link to post

Overgrowth has been completely fine ever since they removed the shotgun and sword and I never understood the hate for riptide. Change some of the weapons and it plays fine. I think stasis ctf is terrible but do I call 343 shit and refuse to play because of it? No. 

  • Upvote (+1) 2
  • Downvote (-1) 7

Share this post


Link to post

If you want to know why 343 doesn't listen to the community it's because everyone starts overreacting and making a big deal before even testing the settings.

90% of the changes are absurd. There's no need to test them. Jesus some of you people are braindead
  • Upvote (+1) 1
  • Downvote (-1) 7

Share this post


Link to post

How about this, dont give your opinion on anything until you've played at least 3 matches on each gametype and can provide proof .

 

 

 

:simms:

 

(not directed at anyone)

 

 

Killa KC implemented that rule in Reach settings testing.

 

If you didn't provide Bungie links to your games to show you playtested them, your feedback post was ignored.

  • Upvote (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post

 but do I call 343 shit and refuse to play because of it? No. 

 

urdoingitwrong

Share this post


Link to post

If you want to know why 343 doesn't listen to the community it's because everyone starts overreacting and making a big deal before even testing the settings.

 

How about we have a compromise? If 343 doesn't try blatantly idiotic, completely ridiculous changes like Sword bottom mid or Binaries in each cave on Coliseum, people won't "make a big deal" about it. Sound good?

  • Upvote (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post

90% of the setting are abusrd? Care to give any examples? Saying "Riptide and Overgrowth" isn't an example.

  • Upvote (+1) 1
  • Downvote (-1) 1

Share this post


Link to post

90% of the setting are abusrd? Care to give any examples? Saying "Riptide and Overgrowth" isn't an example.

Riptide and Overgrowth. If I need to tell you why you're braindead

 

kappa

  • Upvote (+1) 4

Share this post


Link to post

Yea the huge online H1 community was probably super happy about it back then

 

You jest but there were thousands if not tens of thousands of people on XBC and PC combined lol.

Share this post


Link to post

@@LethuL @@SnakeBite have the pros ever talked in a group setting about binding together to force changes?

I don't know what you guys want us to do, we've told them everything we think about trying to add in crazy shit like this but it's still tried. Best we can do is just make sure it doesn't get finalized and in. 

  • Upvote (+1) 4

Share this post


Link to post
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.