Jump to content

Gobias

Member
  • Content Count

    2,243
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Recent Profile Visitors

8,102 profile views
  1. He’s probably racist against non-humans. Never forget #TheFutureIsOrange
  2. BTB Lite would be dope. Who knows, maybe people would eventually prefer it to Heavies, which has always been dumb imo.
  3. Nah man, this a forum, where people interact solely via text. Not reading posts would almost seem to invalidate the point of it all.
  4. If 343 made a game with gameplay identical to Halo 2 with killer graphics, a classic artstyle, and all the legacy features, it still wouldn’t take off like some people think it might. This might be an unpopular opinion. Replace “Halo 2” with any other game in series and it’s the same. All the games got something right. But there’s room for some serious polish.
  5. I like Chill Out, but rockets/camo is ridiculously powerful on that map and can be tough to deal with. I’d say it’s still one of the most interesting maps in the franchise. My main experience with competitive CE is stunt_man’s PC mod, and I’ve had good and bad games on that map. When I play with my friends on LAN, I prefer FFA so we don’t have to worry about spawns since I’m the only one who knows them. Grenades feel OP against spawners, but on the flip side they’re an asset for players trying to regain control if the in-control team is too predictable. I would prefer H1’s grenade mechanics because airbursted grenades are frankly unreactable, and I think you should be punished for trying to throw a grenade in a lot more situations. For me, the ideal frag grenade would have its timer start when it slides to a stop, a fairly small blast radius, and a damage falloff from full shields to half shields. If you land a nade that deals 1/4 shield damage, the nade shouldn’t hit in my opinion and you should have just used your gun. 1/2 shields is at the boundary where you’re also better off having spent the time shooting. Praying for removal of hitmarkers in Halo 6 as well as nades that can be dodged sans thruster pack.
  6. How dare you disrespect anything about Halo CE. Release the hounds.
  7. The same Hoberman who thought Chill Out was bad because it was “confusing.”
  8. So why can’t you use some other weapon? Your team is being punished because you were careless and hit your teammate. It takes more skill to avoid that. My point is that the consequences for friendly fire change, but are no less severe or rewarding lower skill. There is also some cool stuff that could come from damage reflection. You could give your teammate a grenade jump with no shield disadvantage. It would blow my mind to see that play in a tournament.
  9. Not trying to boost a bad idea, but wouldn’t this kind of solve a lot of the concerns about substituting damage reflection for friendly fire? For example if one of your teammates is positioned “too aggressively” and you threw a nade that hit him and an opponent, you get punished more than with simple friendly fire because [hypothetically] the two who were hit by the grenade still have identical shield health while you are made one shot. In other scenarios, it changes what can be considered a “well calculated play”. For example, instead of rocketing two opponents and one teammate and coming out +1, you either kill yourself or just waste a rocket depending if damage is reflected. Best of all, the potentially cheesy strategies in objective modes are avoided. I find it interesting that people think friendly fire is really that important to Halo’s identity—I’ve seen people be more lenient about having random spread on the utility weapon.
  10. Another solution is to nullify all damage done by explosives if a teammate is involved, so nading indiscriminately is not useful. You could inflict damage on the grenade thrower if the wasted grenade/opportunity for damage isn’t enough punishment.
  11. This here is why your idea will never work.
  12. Mostly I think they felt bad/frustrated because people weren’t experimenting with the new weapons and opting for the human/covenant weapons that made more sense. Basically, why allocate design time for something that people just walk over? This is probably also the line of thinking behind making every weapon easy/powerful in Halo 5. Then you get the opposite reasoning with stuff like Spartan Ops, a pretty big development time sink for something that a lot of players probably didn’t touch. I think the failure of more abstract weapons like a gravity gun in playtests is a result of level design. You can’t have traditional Halo encounters and expect players to pick up a weapon that doesn’t output damage as efficiently as a normal gun. That being said, most people who buy a Halo game probably aren’t expecting to have to use their brains in puzzle-like levels. Maybe adding gravity volumes you can turn on to mix up gameplay would work.
  13. They wanted to have a promethean gravity gun but apparently their playtesters didn’t know how to use it so they turned all the promethean weapons into offshoots of existing weapons. Source: Josh Holmes in Halo 4 postmortem GDC presentation.
  14. It’s just not an elegant idea. Complexity instead of depth. One of my favorite ideas from Hardy LeBel (Halo CE designer) is design by subtraction. More of a focus on systems, e.g. how camo and grenades interact with weapons.
  15. Ever heard the phrase “restrictions breed creativity”?
×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.