Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by LimeSoda

  1. At the VERY least, party restrictions should be added to the higher divisons where there are no noobs that would complain about games being a bit slower.
  2. I agree. Something is wrong when the developer is suggesting to play on a smurf account to combat the problem. However, Bravo has said on Reddit they're interested in unranked playlists. I bet they'll be added as it's a very loud request.
  3. Hopefully this game reintroduces some interest in competitive CoD within me and in general around here. AW was so bad there were so few posts about it compared to Ghosts--despite technically being less competitive.
  4. His analogy should have included clubs vs clubs in different countries then. But perhaps.
  5. Exactly, as most of us competitive players would. The problem is 343 feels the need to appeal to players that are getting ranked and aren't necessarily that competitive, which is a vast majority. And 343 probably thinks they won't stand for slower matchmaking times, therefore 100% party restrictions can't be included. Perhaps another solution is to include it when at a higher division, such as Onyx, or even the one before that. That way it doesn't affect majority of the player base, only the players that most definitely care about fair matches. To clarify, I think the ideal solution would to be simply add in 100% party sized matchmaking but if they insist on no I feel my condensed list would help.
  6. I assume the reason there is not party sized matchmaking 100% of the time, like in Halo 3, is because there is a worry about search times being slower (in fact this is pretty much what Josh said in regards to it). There is a solution, though, and it lies in the number of ranked playlists. Currently, a lot of the community has expressed concern about the lack of social playlists, as they want to play the game casually, but with more variety than simply Warzone. Even as a competitive player, I support this, as most of us do. If there were less ranked playlists, it wouldn't be as big of a deal to have the search times be a bit slower to include 100% party sized matchmaking for there would be other options--social playlists--where it is not present and very fast matches would be guaranteed. I propose the playlists being set up like this: Warzone: Warzone Warzone Assault Arena (Ranked) Team Arena FFA *Added in* Team Doubles Social (Unranked) Team Slayer SWAT Breakout *Added in* Infection Weekend Social ?? ?? Not sure what to do with BTB
  7. I think the OP should be divided into "features that should return" and "features we'd like to see" even though they're both under the latter technically.
  8. Yeah it's quite lame. I knew when they announced party restrictions weren't 100% it'd make for a frustrating experience.This is also why the number of ranked playlists and no social ones is perhaps a detriment. I would take the trade off of having fewer ranked playlists covering the core competitive modes (4v4, 2v2, FFA) with 100% party restrictions over many ranked playlists with the "prioritizing" we have now, imo. Plus then there would be social playlists and those wouldn't have to have strict party restrictions or any at all perhaps, effectively making everyone happy except for those who wanted to play niche gametypes very competitively.
  9. I'm looking at the Beyond Hoodie and I'm wondering if the two sizes available, 3x and 4x, mean 3/4 times extra large?
  10. In the game you can't see specific playlist rank besides a brief overview of their service record but in both the pre and post game lobby you can see everyone's rank in the playlist
  11. Can you see what players are playing together like in Halo 3?
  12. He's not crying about descope rofl, at least not from the OP. He literally asked a question
  13. Just ask for BR starts or once you start playing better people gentlemen's BR starts. If they don't want them you'll probably beat them 1v1 anyway as they'll be bad.
  14. Me (tag LimeSoda) and @@2pro4show (tag Nero)
  15. I'm nearly positive at least in ranked 4v4 playlists you can't match a To4 without one. It even says in the corner "searching for team of 4 with equal skill". He might be technically right if you count squad battle or some discontinued ranked playlist. But anyway, the lack of 100% definite party sized matchmaking is a bit worrying. I'll see how prominent it becomes before I complain, but this has been a request by the community since its discontinuation and it's not being implemented how we suggested.
  16. Was Pidge harder than expected or nah
  17. Yeah, I didn't get to catch it live actually, just peaked at the bracket. Interesting how you guys still have the other stages legal--I'm straight ass at Hyrule so I would be frustrated if that was their CP. And Mario's my worst matchup. I mean you probably went Jiggs, right? But I would have to go Falcon and Mario just simply doesn't die it seems, is incredibly hard to edge guard.. I mean you know all of this but gahh. I'm probably worse at the matchup than Kirby, tbh, at least there I can 0-death Kirby with a grab. Speaking of other stages, I've watched all the vod of Xanadu with the use of the 19xx mod and it's not too bad. The common misconception before was that ledge DI wasn't possible on any of the stages, but it pretty much is everywhere--maybe not Yoshi's no clouds, but regardless I think that stage is a bit of stretch for competitive play, the blastzones are kinda fucked.
  18. @@2pro4show you took a game off ybomb? Good shit
  19. Is there a reason you don't get on Netplay?
  20. I really want an update on what happens. But he should have called the police while in NOLA, still.
  21. Is a super early tournament confirmed even, though? But I 100% agree.
  22. So just have party size on in areas where applicable.
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy.