Jump to content

King Bob

  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. @ WIth a best of 7 serie, if a full serie is played it means 14 games are played. So thats just one more. My point is more that a Best of 15 serie leaves out the 'if they win 1 game now then theyre champion' - as for the other team has to win 6 or more games when its 3-2 in first Bo7.., which in my opinion kind of kills the excitement Edit: @Bo5 edit. Best of 5 for a final match? So the tournament champion can be announced just after 3 games?..
  2. Hey guys, I was wondering what you are thinking of this, Im talking about tournament finals of Halo 1, 2v2 team slayer: Normally a tournaments' big finals (of a double elimination tournament (meaning everybody gets a second chance with a losers bracket)) are Best of 7 (first to 4), where the winner of the WB has to win only 1 serie and the LBwinner has to win 2 series (as the WBwinner also deserves a second chance). I was thinking that big finals can be over pretty fast, if the WBwinner just wins with 4 games he wins the tournament. So now I thought, why not make the big finals Best of 13 (first to 7) or Best of 15 (first to 8) and give the WBwinner an advantage of 2-0 or 3-0? This way the final fight is longer (at least 1 or 2 games): longer enjoyable/more exciting for viewers, endurance plays more part and most important: a much wider variaty of maps can be played as well as those maps on both teams' hosts. What do you think?

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy.